RKMallik

RKMallik
Beauty with structural Engineering looks like this

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Estimating Beam Depth for Initial trial

Deflection criteria: Use simplified form of IS456,2000 cl23.2.1


Span/deff= BV*mft*mfc*mff

For Both End Simply supported , Basic Value(BV) =26

mft= 0.8 for Assumed 2.5% tension steel

Assume; mfc = 1.25 for 1% Compression steel

Assume ;mff= 0.8 for web width/ flange width<0.3

Span/depth = 20*0.8*1.25*0.8=16 (approx), for simply supported

Span/depth = 26*0.8*1.25*0.8=20( approx), for both end continuous

Span/depth= 23*0.8*1.25*0.8=18( approx), for one end simply supported and one end continuous

Sample Calculation;
Beam span=4200mm
Boundary Condition; one end simply supported other end continuous
deff= span/18= 4200/18= 233.33 mm


Overall depth = deff+(assumed bar dia)/2+Clear cover = 233.33+25/2+25= 270.83 Assume 300mm ( 12”)

Ductile Detailing criteria( IS13920;1993)
 
The spacing of hoops over a length of 2d at either end of a beam


S<[ deff/4, 8*φsmall longitudinal bar, 24*φhoop, 300 ]min

Sample Calculation

Assume, s =75 mm, φsmall longitudinal bar =12mm, 24*φhoop =8mm


Effective depth of the beam/4 =75 mm


Effective depth of the beam =300mm


Overall depth of the beam = 300+25/2+25=337.5 =350 mm (approx round off value)


Check for S(75mm)<[ (deff/4=75), (8*φsmall longitudinal bar =96), (24*φhoop =192), 300 ]min=75mm; Satisfied

Conclusion: Thumb Rule
Span/depth = 16 (approx), for simply supported

Span/depth = 20( approx), for both end continuous
Span/depth= 18( approx), for one end simply supported and one end continuous





9 comments:

  1. its nice to see your knowledge sharing concept.....

    I would like to see with the IBC and ASCE reference....

    ReplyDelete
  2. in coming days I will post some more with IBC and ASCE reference

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mallik sir, very nice step towards the development of structural engineering and hope to see such valuable papers in the near future also and if u could post some literature related to the Beam column capacity ratio.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Suberna ji.... I will post some process regarding check for beam column capacity ratio soon.....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Useful relation on Span to Depth.

    But the assumed tensile steel percentage of 2.5% is quite on the higher side in view of Ductile Design.

    It would be better if this relation is presented as function of tensile steel percentage too.

    BREINS- Building Research Institute (P) Ltd., Nepal
    http://buildingresearch.com.np

    ReplyDelete
  6. thanks Amreet sir, for initial trial it is ok. final design will demand the exact value......

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As you said for initial trial it's OK.

    But for final Check of Deflection Real Steel Percentages used in Beams, Concrete Grades shall be considered.

    Also, the real boundary conditions of Beam elements in the RC frame structures shall be considered that will have significant effect on final deflection value.

    BREINS-Building Research Institute (P) Ltd., Nepal
    http://buildingresearch.com.np

    ReplyDelete
  9. BREINS Structural Care Unit, BSCU on 30-Aug-2010 Shares:

    In Earthquakes, During Pounding Effect, between two attached dissimilar Buildings in terms of Height & Mass; Which building will suffer higher damage ??? (A) Building with higher mass & greater height (B) Building with lower mass & lesser height

    Sharing's from :

    http://www.buildingresearch.com.np/services/erd/erd2.php

    ReplyDelete